Actions

Work Header

A Place to Land

Summary:

After learning the truth about why he was born, Buck makes the most deliberate choice of his life: he applies to Asterbridge House, a private matchmaking service he’s been saving for since he was eighteen, because more than anything, he wants a spouse, children, and a home that lasts.

He does not expect to be matched with Tommy Kinard.

Tommy is older, steadier, richer, and far better at seeing through Buck than Buck is ready for. He listens carefully, kisses gently, and makes room for Buck exactly as he is, which would be easier to enjoy if Buck’s family didn’t think he was making a mistake. It would be easier still if Maddie wasn’t trying to fix his life for him, or if wanting something for himself didn’t feel so much like betraying everyone else’s expectations.

Somewhere between first dates, family betrayals, crossed lines, and one very bad fire, Buck has to figure out whether he can stop asking permission to want the life he actually wants — and whether Tommy might be a place to land.

Notes:

Author’s Note:
Asterbridge House is my original fictional creation: a private, high-discretion matchmaking and family-formation institution for people seeking serious long-term partnership, marriage, and domestic stability. It is not part of 9-1-1 canon. In this story, Asterbridge functions as the AU framework that gives Buck a structured way to pursue the spouse, children, and lasting home he has wanted for years. You can learn more about Asterbridge House at my site katylark.wordpress.com

Chapter 1: Prologue: Asterbridge House

Chapter Text

PROLOGUE


 

Everyone had an opinion about Asterbridge House.

That was one of the few things that had remained true since 1984, when it began in two discreet rooms above a solicitor’s office in London and quietly set about offending people by taking love more seriously than most of them liked. Over the years it had been called romantic, predatory, old-fashioned, elitist, absurd, manipulative, lifesaving, and, by one especially bitter columnist in 2007, “a highly polished institution for those determined to outsource destiny.”

Asterbridge House had survived that review. It had survived several lawsuits over the decades, most of them tied to privacy, match failure, contract disputes, affiliate referrals, or clients claiming the firm had overpromised stability. Most settled quietly or were dismissed under confidentiality terms, which only made the gossip more durable. It had survived a tabloid leak, a class-bias scandal, a California affiliate disaster involving unethical surrogacy contracts, and at least one catastrophic public match that had nearly given every critic it had ever had the satisfaction of being right.

It had survived because, unlike its critics, Asterbridge House knew exactly what it was selling.

Not love. Never love. Love was far too unruly for that.

Asterbridge sold seriousness.

It sold long interviews in quiet rooms and intake files thick enough to make a person reconsider all their life choices. It sold discretion, structure, vetting, counseling, mediation, paperwork, and difficult questions asked by people too polished to look embarrassed on a client’s behalf. It sold background checks and compatibility reviews and legal referrals and, for those who needed it, family-formation support coordinated through carefully selected partners. It sold the deeply unromantic labor of trying to build a life sturdy enough to hold love if and when it came.

Its motto, embossed in deep green on cream stationery, read: Where Intent Becomes Home.

People mocked that, too.

And then they applied anyway.

Some were wealthy. Some were not. Some came from old money and private schools and families who discussed marriage over estates and tax law. Some came because they had spent years putting away twenty dollars at a time, stubbornly, secretly, because wanting a spouse and children felt too important to leave to chance. There were public-service discounts in certain branches. Payment plans in others. Tiered memberships for different levels of complexity and privacy. A teacher could save for years and sit in the same waiting room as a surgeon, a firefighter, a widower, a minor celebrity, an exhausted lawyer, a quietly hopeful millionaire, or someone who had simply reached the point of admitting they did not want to be alone forever.

That was the other thing Asterbridge House sold, though it would never have phrased it so plainly.

Dignity.

It treated wanting permanence as something respectable.

That alone was enough to unsettle people who preferred to pretend that anyone asking openly for devotion, marriage, children, or home was either naïve or desperate. Asterbridge House disagreed. It had been disagreeing, in measured tones and expensive offices, for decades. It did not promise soulmates. It did not promise marriage. It did not even promise success, not in the sweeping, cinematic sense people liked to imagine. What it promised was rigor. Safety. Confidentiality. Intentionality. It promised that if a person came to them and said, however awkwardly, that they wanted a life partner, a family, a place at the table that would still be theirs next year and the year after that, someone would take them seriously.

Not everyone appreciated that.

The firm’s critics said it was too selective. Asterbridge considered that a feature, not a flaw. It screened for violence, fraud, stalking, coercion, and the sort of entitlement that mistook desire for ownership. It deferred clients in acute crisis. It dismissed clients who lied. It turned people away when it believed they were unsafe, unready, or likely to do harm. This offended exactly the sort of people who believed money ought to buy them access to everything, including other human beings. The fact that it did not was another reason Asterbridge House had lasted.

Its loyal clients said other things.

That it was expensive but worth it. That it was old-fashioned in the useful ways and modern in the necessary ones. That it asked questions nobody else thought to ask until it was too late. That it noticed things. That it refused to be charmed by beauty, money, lineage, or desperation. That it could be maddening, intrusive, and frighteningly perceptive. That it had, in some cases, changed people’s lives.

And so people came to it with hopes they would not say anywhere else.

They came wanting husbands and wives. Wives and wives. Husbands and husbands. Children. Stability. A second chance. A first one. They came grieving. They came divorced. They came bruised, careful, shy, and overprepared. They came because ordinary dating had failed them, because time had begun to matter, because privacy mattered more, because they were lonely, because they were hopeful, because they were ashamed of being hopeful and tired of that shame. They came because they wanted to stop pretending that the thing they wanted most was somehow too much to ask for.

Asterbridge House never told them it was not too much.

It simply asked what they meant.

Then it wrote everything down.

Then it opened the file.

And somewhere, in London or Los Angeles or New York or Toronto, behind a closed office door and beneath the old green-and-cream crest, a life that had once seemed impossible began, quietly, with a name spoken aloud and taken seriously.